|
Dodd-Frank and the Non-Agency MBS Markets |
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Sunday, 01 August 2010 21:14 |
|
This article was originally published in the August 2010 issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.structuredfinancenews.com) The Dodd-Frank financial reform act signed this month by President Obama was, in my reading, very unfriendly to the non-agency MBS market. Taken in its entirety, key provisions of the bill create significant and protracted uncertainty for issuers and investors, further delaying the much-anticipated revival of private-label MBS issuance. |
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 01 August 2010 21:22 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Quantifying Liquidity Premium of Money Market Funds in the Low Yield Environment, Part II |
|
Written by Capital Advisors Group
|
|
Monday, 02 August 2010 10:59 |
|
This paper attempts to quantify the impact of a liquidity premium in money market funds by modeling three hypothetical portfolios of 29, 60, and 121-day weighted average maturities (WAM). Through our modeling process, we found the WAM extensions would have resulted in 0.11% and 0.31%, respectively, of additional annual yield potential over the 29-day WAM portfolio. The premise of the exercise is that by using separately managed accounts of custom maturities, investors may be able to recuperate part of the reduced yield caused by the more stringent liquidity requirements of the revised 2a-7 rule. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Home Prices and Mortgage Performance |
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Sunday, 27 June 2010 21:16 |
|
This article originally appeared in the July 2010 issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.structuredfinancenews.com) The defining characteristic of the economic downturn of the last few years has been the collapse in real estate prices from their 2006 peak. The losses have impacted the economy in a variety of ways. Aside from devaluing many families’ single largest asset, declining home prices removed the equity extraction that had been juicing consumption for years. The housing crash has also impacted the labor markets by both destroying many high-paying jobs in the construction trades and impairing the mobility of workers saddled with negative equity. |
|
Last Updated on Sunday, 27 June 2010 21:31 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
About FixedIncomeColor.com |
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Monday, 09 March 2009 12:38 |
|
FixedIncomeColor.com® is an on-line community designed to facilitate interaction between participants in the fixed-income markets. Sponsored and administered by Bill Berliner of Berliner Consulting & Research, the site contains information, data, commentary and research on a variety of fixed-income investment products. Before getting started, please visit the"About Us" page for more information and the basic rules of the site. Also, please be sure to visit the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy sections. Membership is free. And if you've forgotten your username or password, it's easy to reset them; just follow the directions in the User Login section on the left side of the Home page. We want your ideas and feedback. Please click “Contact us” to message the Administrator.
Thanks…BB |
|
Last Updated on Friday, 08 January 2010 12:49 |
|
Whither Fannie and Freddie? A Proposal for Reforming the Housing GSEs |
|
Thursday, 27 May 2010 07:46 |
|
by Donald Marron and Phillip Swagel We propose a specific reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that securitize and guarantee conforming mortgages. Our plan protects taxpayers and the overall economy from the systemic risk posed by the former GSE model, while ensuring that financing remains available for housing even in periods of credit market strains. Under this proposal the two firms would become private companies that buy conforming mortgages and bundle them into securities that are eligible for government backing. The reformed firms would not have the investment portfolios that were the main source of risk under their previous structure. The federal government would offer a guarantee on mortgage-backed securities composed of conforming loans. This guarantee would be explicit, backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. To compensate taxpayers for taking on housing risk, Fannie and Freddie would pay an actuarially fair fee to the government in return for the guarantee, and the shareholders of the firms would take losses before the government guarantee kicks in. |
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 June 2010 13:31 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|