|
Implications of a Principal Reduction Program |
|
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Originally published in the February 2012 issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.sourcemedia.com) The notion of widespread principal reduction for underwater borrowers has gained new currency since the beginning of the year. In addition to articles in the popular financial press, the Federal Reserve’s recent white paper on housing devoted a section to discussing the concept of “loan modifications with principal reduction.” Nonetheless, the concept of aiding middle-class homeowners through principal reduction is politically tempting, and political pressure to “do something” (evidenced by another mass refinancing plan proposed in President Obama’s State of the Union address) is intensifying. However, the experience of HAMP and other initiatives suggests that a broad program to reduce the loan balances of underwater borrowers held or guaranteed by the GSEs would be extremely expensive, ultimately ineffective and potentially counterproductive. |
|
|
Improvising Housing Policies |
|
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Originally published in the January 2012 issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.sourcemedia.com) The passage of the payroll tax holiday extension in December was, in my mind, a watershed moment for the mortgage and MBS markets. For the first time, Congress instituted a tax on mortgage transactions, to be collected by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In this light, the operative question for regulators and policy makers is simple: “What are we trying to accomplish?” |
|
Optimizing Fed MBS Purchases |
|
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Originally published in the December issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.sourcemedia.com) Bloomberg recently reported that a number of dealers expect the Fed to initiate a new round of MBS purchases, with the goal of pushing mortgage rates lower and giving a boost to the still-sickly housing market. The idea of more MBS purchases raises a host of critical issues, particularly with respect to an exit strategy. (An investor who holds more than $1 trillion of an asset class effectively becomes the market.) Nonetheless, I believe that a well-conceived program can positively impact mortgage rates and housing. |
|
|
The Hidden Threat to the Mortgage Market |
|
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Key elements of recent policy initiatives, such as the revised HARP program and the Fed’s “Twist,” have focused on either pushing down fixed mortgage rates or taking advantage of their current low levels. In addition to the Fed’s actions, many observers have placed a devotional faith in the Fed’s ability, as Lawrence Summers wrote in a recent op-ed piece in the Washington Post, to “…support demand and the housing market by again expanding purchases of mortgage-backed securities.” However, an underappreciated threat to the mortgage and housing markets is the reliance of many American borrowers on low Libor rates. This means that the Fed and other policymakers must be aware of the vulnerability of the U.S. housing markets to rate spikes resulting from upheavals in the European financial system. |
|
The Campaign Against the Banks |
|
|
Written by Bill Berliner
|
|
Originally published in the October issue of Asset Securitization Report (www.sourcemedia.com) Investors have recently focused on the difficulties encountered by the European banks, which hold huge amounts of troubled sovereign debt. However, I am quite worried over the state of the banking system in the United States. The recent changes to monetary policy by the Fed, the attempt by state attorneys general to coerce an onerous settlement over flawed servicing practices, and a continued litigation feeding frenzy have put the domestic banking system at risk. Whatever the legitimate grievances, the desire to both punish the banks and obtain reparations for past practices risks pushing the financial system into a new and immensely damaging crisis. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 13 |