| 3/8/10 MBS Commentary--Spreads and Volatility, Buyouts and Implied Fannie Speeds |
|
| Written by Bill Berliner |
|
MBS performed well last week, with the Fannie 30-year current coupon rate tightening by four basis points on the week to interpolated Treasuries and 2 basis points to swaps. Duration-neutral price performance over the period was also fairly good; most liquid Fannie coupons (up to 6s) outperformed Treasuries by 8-12 ticks on the week. There are a few interesting things to note with respect to the MBS market, however. The chart below indicates that the 30-year current coupon is approaching its tightest levels over the last six months or so; however, spreads have not pushed through the tights first seen in mid-November, and again seen in early January. Moreover, spreads versus swaps remain at the midpoint of a range first established last September. Depending on whether you think that swaps remain a relevant benchmark, MBS may not be as richly valued as it appears at first blush. Moreover, if the sector is rich, I’d argue that it has a great deal to do with the effect of the Fed’s purchase program on volatility. This point is also made by Charts 3 and 4 below. Chart 3 shows the bands (using two different lookback periods) have contracted over time, and are currently approaching lows last seen in the spring of 2007. A similar picture is shown in Chart 4, which shows the MOVE index, (“a yield-curve weighted index of normalized implied volatility on 1-month Treasury options,” according to Bloomberg) along with the 30-day realized vol of the 10-year Treasury. (Note that while the 10-year realized vol tracks the index well, realized vol for the 2-year has a much lower correlation.)
These charts indicate that intermediate and long-maturity Treasury volatility continues to trend lower. Moreover, I’d argue that the Fed purchases have had a significant impact on realized volatility of Treasuries. The Fed has pulled the equivalent of about $650 billion of 10-year Treasuries out of the market. By pulling this massive amount of mortgage duration (with its associated negative convexity) out of the market, the investment community collectively needs to buy and sell far less duration to stay flat when the market moves; in turn, this reduces the intensity of changes in Treasury yields. Therefore, the Fed’s purchases have put downward pressure on mortgage spreads for two reasons—the obvious supply considerations, and the reduced level of volatility in the bond market. This also suggests that mortgage spread may not widen dramatically once the Fed stops buying MBS later this month, as the reduced volatility should stay with the market for a while--at current production levels, it would take about two years to add an equivalent amount of mortgage duration to the market. (I made a similar argument in my February column in Asset Securitization Report, available here.) The February prepayment reports showed that Freddie Mac speeds reflected the delinquent loan buyouts, with some premium cohorts virtually paying off. (2007 Gold 7s, for example, prepaid at 98% CPR.) As noted in some articles (see here), Fannie’s buyouts have been much less organized and efficient, with a series of press releases outlining their procedures. The result has been significant disarray in the market for premium Fannie dollar rolls.
Dollar rolls levels for lower coupons are reflecting the likelihood that prepayment speeds in March for TBAs will not peak until April. Exhibit 6 indicates that the current level of the Fannie 6 roll for March/April of 3 3/8s ticks, which equates to a March speed in the area of 57 CPR. For the April/May roll, however, the roll is currently trading to a drop of -7+ ticks, which represents a speed in April of around 78 CPR.
![]() What seems likely is that, despite the dislocations caused by Fannie’s buyouts, Fannie 5.5s remain quite squeezed, reflecting both the Fed’s purchases of roughly $150 billion of the coupon along with normal runoff of about $120 billion since the beginning of 2009. It also reflects the fact that the buyouts themselves will reduce the available float for the coupon; speeds for the next two months of 60 CPR would remove something in the area of $70 billion in float from the market.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 263 Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|