|
|
3/9/10--Second Mortgages in the Spotlight; Reverse Repurchase Primer; My Opinion on Mortgage Rates After the Fed; Provident Cuts Interest Only |
|
|
Tuesday, 09 March 2010 07:39 |
|
The Federal Reserve has a little more than ten business days to complete their well-publicized purchase of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Last week it bought $10 billion, breaking their 3-week streak of $11 billion. Only fixed-rate agency MBS securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae are/were eligible assets for the program. Everyone knows that the end of the program is imminent. |
|
|
3/8/10--Credit Unions Expanding Loan Production; Ready for Buybacks?; Lender Rating Model; FHA Approval News; Four More Bank Failures |
|
|
Monday, 08 March 2010 09:05 |
|
When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bike. Then I realized that God doesn't work that way. So instead I stole a bike and asked Him to forgive me. Neither strategy worked for four more banks, as the FDIC shut them down Friday (without finding buyers for two of them leading to losses for depositors who had balances exceeding the agency's insurance limits). Sun American's (FL) deposits and assets were acquired by First-Citizens Bank (NC) at a cost to the FDIC of $103 million. The Bank of Illinois was "absorbed" by Heartland Bank (IL) at a cost to the FDIC of about $54 million. Waterfield Bank (MD), at a cost to the FDIC $51 million, and Utah's Centennial Bank are now being run by the FDIC, with the help of Zion's Bank, at a cost of about $96 million. |
|
3/4/10--Underwriters Marching to Lenders' Tune; The Next Generation of Borrowers; New Faces at the Closing Table; MBS Trading Margins |
|
|
Thursday, 04 March 2010 07:52 |
|
Lately I have been hearing from producers, some of whom are upset about the current lending environment, some not. But for a slightly different view of things, here is what one very experienced and knowledgeable underwriter wrote to me: "It used to be that we could 'underwrite' a loan and use common sense to navigate individual circumstances and actually make a decision that a loan was a good credit risk. Then DU and LP came along and gave us the laundry list that had to be followed. We were still able to manually underwrite loans for those transactions that did not fit the box. Then the bottom fell out of the business and everyone got scared and new rules came out. Investors and Wall Street were to blame for allowing individuals who were not telling the truth to buy homes. Today investors are pre-underwriting loans prior to purchase and we have to 'march to their tune' including getting pieces of paper that seem ridiculous, but since we need the investor to purchase the loan so we obtain them anyway. Only the most qualified borrowers with all their ducks in a row get loans these days. |
|
|
3/5/10--Lender Implementation of FHA Flipping Guideline; SAFE Act Still Weighs on Originators, Thornburg Execs in Trouble |
|
|
Friday, 05 March 2010 08:11 |
|
Some things are simple, others not. On January 15, 2010, HUD issued a Waiver of Requirements of 24 CFR 203.37a(b)(2) revising exceptions to the FHA Flipping Rule policies. (Notice that HUD did not actually issue a Mortgagee Letter.) The FHA Flipping Rule prohibits FHA financing if the contract of sale for the purchase of the subject property is executed within 90 days of the prior acquisition by the seller, and the waiver temporarily puts this aside. Where do the various mortgage investors stand on following or not following the waiver? Wells Fargo has taken the approach of being silent on the issue - and if WF is silent on an issue, the default policy is to follow the agencies with their policies. Therefore these loans are a "go". Neither Bank of America, SunTrust, nor GMAC have adopted the FHA issued directive on the waiver of the 90-day FHA Flip Rule, however. |
|
3/3/10--Fannie Mae's Buyback Plan; HARP Extended; Lock Desks Busier; RESPA vs. USPS; Rates to Rise 50bps |
|
|
Wednesday, 03 March 2010 08:00 |
|
Contracts...Does attaching your signature mean anything anymore? We sign so many things with a quick scrawl: bills at the restaurant, checks, rental car forms...agreements with investors? Do we really read them, and take defensive steps ahead of signing them, or do originators just sign them because the pool of investors is so small? For example, who is liable if there is a mistake, and what can be done to correct it? Unfortunately now many of the terms of these agreements are "coming home to roost" and the ramifications are expected to continue to change the profile of the mortgage banking industry. |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 8 |